Free weekly educational series
You don’t need another roundup of AI tools—you need practical and personalized AI training developed by an AI Engineer and PhD Workplace Psychologist.
Personalize your weekly series
Step 1 of 4Literacy ≠ fluency
Literacy
Knowing the vocabulary, memorizing prompts, and tracking each new model.
Fluency
Knowing when, where, and how to bring AI into consequential work.
The Workplace Labs framework
Select a level to explore it. The critical shift is from using AI to guiding the work.
A better operating model
A person checking the final output is too late. Better work happens when AI joins clarification, comparison, and assumption-testing—while people retain judgment and decision rights.
How it works
Neil and Jonathan write the core content of every issue. A specially trained AI agent then personalizes each email for the individual receiving it—so the prompts inside don’t just demonstrate the concepts, they’re immediately useful to you and your work.
The ideas, examples, and behavioral science behind every issue are drafted and edited by hand—before any personalization happens.
The agent reshapes each issue around your role, fluency level, and blockers—never a segment average or a generic adaptation.
Every issue closes with a prompt recipe tied to your work, so the concept is useful the same day it lands.
Three experience paths
These three starting points are a foundational lens—not the whole picture. Your role, fluency level, and the specific frictions slowing you down combine to calibrate every issue to you.
You’ve read the cautionary tales and the promises, and you’re not sure which to believe. So you’ve kept AI at arm’s length — while quietly wondering if everyone else is moving ahead.
Your issues will start with trust: private tools, low-risk first steps, and evidence you can check yourself.
This is the Skeptical / Cautious path.
You reach for AI most days — a summary here, a first draft there. Some weeks it saves you an hour. Others it hands back something generic and you can’t quite say why.
Your issues will start with direction: briefs, constraints, and checkpoints that make the output yours.
This is the Active / Inconsistent path.
You’ve already built the workflows that make your colleagues raise an eyebrow. Your question isn’t whether AI works — it’s where the next bottleneck, handoff, or failure mode will surface.
Your issues will start with architecture: decision rights, orchestration loops, and experiments at organizational scale.
This is the Fluent Frontier-Builder path.